Polish-Ukrainian Studies

“Jesuit Priests” in a union project and a romantic myth

2022, 9, Volume 9

Ihor Isichenko

0000-0003-3270-104X

DOI

10.31338/2451-2958spu.9.2

Publication date

18.07.2022

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 3.0 PL

Field

Humanities

Discipline

literary studies, culture and religion studies, arts studies, history, philosophy

Language of publication

Polish, English, Ukrainian

Downloads

PDF 117 KB

Article

Number of views:119

Number of downloads:89

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The reception of relations between the Orthodox and Catholic Churches by the Ukrainian national consciousness was largely formed by a romantic myth. It appeared in the works by Taras Shevchenko, in the documents of the the Brotherhood of Saints Cyril and Methodius. According to this myth, the Church Union of Brest (1596) was the result of the colonial policy of the Polish government and the intrigues of the Jesuit priests. In fact, the influence of the royal administration on the religious life of the inhabitants of the Polish-Lithuanian state was extremely limited. „Henrician Articles” of 1573 forced the king to adhere to religious tolerance and to recognize the nobility’s right to free choice of religion. The Roman Catholic clergy, for the most part, did not want to grant Christians the Eastern rite of parity. The Society of Jesus, which formed a separate province in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1574, was guided not by political but by religious motives. Benedict Herbest (1531–1598) already in his work „Wypisanie drogi” („The Desribing of The Way”, 1566) discusses the prospect of restoring unity with the Orthodox Ruthenians. In the book „Wiary Kościołu Rzymskiego wywody” („The Arguments of the Roman Church’ Belief”) he explains Ruthenia’s departure from unity with Rome by lack of education and low religious consciousness. Piotr Skarga (1536–1612) wrote the book „O jedności Kocioła Bożego” („About the God’s Church’s Unity”, 1577), when he had not great authority in the Church and when he was little known in society. At the Brest synod in 1596 Skarga was not a participant and organizer, but only an observer and chronicler. Both Herbest and Skarga were only inflammatory polemicists who responded to the challenge of the Reform by calling for the consolidation of the Church in a single organism. The romantic myth is refuted by a closer acquaintance with their works and life experience.

Keywords:

romanticism,myth,Taras Shevchenko,polemics,Benedict Herbest,Piotr Skarga,the Union of Brest

Bibliography

Bukowski J., Dzieje reformacyi w Polsce od wejścia jej do Polski aż do jej upadku, t. 1, Kraków 1883, XIV, 712 s.

Chubatyi M., Istoriia khrystyianstva na Rusy-Ukraini, t. 2, ch. 1, Ukrainskyi katolytskyi universytet im. s. Klymenta papy, Rym 1976, 264 s.

Dontsov D., Sprava unii [w:] Vybrani tvory: u 10 t., t. 2, Vidrodzhennia, Drohobych; Lviv 2012, s. 132–138.

Herbest В., SJ, Wiary Kościoła Rzymskiego wywody y Greckiego niewolstwa historya: dla jedności, [b.m.] 1586, 26 s. nn.

Inglot TI M., Tovarystvo Isusa v Rosiiskii imperii (1772–1820) i yoho uchast u zahalnomu vidnovlenni ordenu, per. z ital, Svichado, Lviv 2009, 428 s.

Kamenka Yu., Politychnyi natsionalizm: evoliutsiia idei [w:] „Natsionalizm: Teorii natsii ta natsionalizmu vid Yohana Fikhte do Ernesta Helnera”, Smoloskyp, Kyiv 2006, s. 89–103.

Kohn H., Pan-Slavism: Its History and Ideology, wyd. University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana 1953, ix+356 pp.

Konfederacja warszawska 1573 roku: wielka karta polskiej tolerancji, oprac. Mirosław Korolko i Janusz Tazbir, PAX, Warszawa 1980, 54, [3] s.

Kostomarov M., Knyhy bytiia ukrainskoho narodu, Novi shliakhy, Lviv; Kyiv 1921, 24 s.

Laktiur Zh., Yezuity: u 2 t., t. 1, Svichado, Lviv 2011, 552 s.

Lypynskyi V., Relihiia i Tserkva v istorii Ukrainy, Bulava, Niu York 1956, 112 s.

Nalyvaiko D. S., Taras Shevchenko v konteksti romantyzmu ta natsionalizmu [w:] „Mahisterium. Literaturoznavchi studii”, wyd. Natsionalnyi uniwersytet „Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”, vyp. 21, Kyiv 2005, s. 21–35.

Pamiatky polemichnoho pysmenstva kintsia XVI i poch. XVII v., vydav d-r Kyrylo Studynskyi, t. 1, nakladom NTSh, Lviv 1906, LXII; 314 c.

Shevchenko T., Povne zibrannia tvoriv: u 12 t., t. 1, Naukova dumka, Kyiv 1989, 528 s.

Shevchenko T., Povne zibrannia tvoriv: u 12 t., t. 2, Naukova dumka, Kyiv 1990, 592 s.

Tezisy o 300-letii vossoiedinieniyia Ukrainy s Rossiyei (1654–1954 gg.), Gospolytyzdat, Moskva 1954, 30 s.

Vyshenskyi I., Tvory, Derzhlitvydav, Kyiv 1959, 270 s.

Zorin A., Kormia dvuglavogo orla: Russkaia literatura i gosudarstvennaia ideologia v poslednei trieti XVIII – piervoi trieti XIX vieka [w:] „Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie”, Moskva 2001, 416 s.

Similar publications