Still life in painting and literature: time-space features

2017, 4, Volume 4

Berdyansk State Pedagogical University


Publication date

04.05.2017

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

Humanities

Discipline

literary studies, culture and religion studies, arts studies, history, philosophy

Language of publication

Polish, Ukrainian, English

Downloads

PDF 850 KB

Article

Number of views:98

Number of downloads:48

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

There are investigate the features of time-space of still life in intermedial aspect, pay attention to peculiarities of still life painting and literary text in the article. The genre of still life, transforming from traditional painting, imaginative in verbal acquires several meanings: as a proper ecphrasis (description of artistic canvas of still life); hypotypozis (verbal still life); using at the level nomenosphere (harping term „still life”).

Keywords:

Bibliography

B. Vypper, Problema y razvytye natiurmorta, Sankt-Peterburh 2005, 384 s.

Ch. Sterling, Martwa natura. Od starożytności po wiek XX: tłum. Joanna Pollakówna i Wiktor Dłuski, Warszawa 1998, 367 s.

E.O. Dymshyts, Natiurmort v ukrainskomu zhyvopysi na zlami XIX–XX stolit, [v:] Ukrainske mystetstvo ta arkhitektura kintsia XIX – pochatku XX st., Kyiv 2000, s. 122–137.

F. Prokopovych, Sochynenyia,pod red. Y. P. Eremyna, Moskva– Lenynhrad 1961, s. 361.

F. Prokopovych, Pro rytorychne mystetstvo, [v:] F. Prokopovych, Filosofski tvory v trokh tomakh: per.z latynskoi, T. 1, Kyiv 1979, s. 387.

O. Biletskyi, V masterskoi khudozhnyka slova, [v:] O. Biletskyi, Zibrannia prats u piaty tomakh, T. 3, Kyiv 1966, s. 274–489.

Yu. Smolych, „Nature-morte” u khudozhnii literaturi, [v:] Vaplite, Kharkiv 1927, Ch. 4, s. 158–177.

Yu.M. Lotman, Natiurmort v perspektyve semyotyky, [v:] Yu.M. Lotman, Staty po semyotyke kulturы y yskusstva, Sankt-Peterburh 2002, s. 340–348.

S. Buryny, Typolohyia natiurmorta v lyterature (na materyale XX veka), [v:] “Khudozhestvennыi tekst y eho heo-kulturnыe stratyfykatsyy”, Trieste 2000, s. 145–174.

R. Bobrыk, Zachem stol natiurmortu? [v:] Kultura y tekst. Lyteraturovedenye. Chast 1. Sbornyk nauchnыkh trudov, pod red. H.P. Kozubovskoi, Sankt–Peterburh–Barnaul 1998, s. 27–41.

R. Bobryk, Martwa natura: Gatunek, motywy, kompozycje, Siedlce 2011, 232 s.

V.I. Krekoten, Natiurmort yak pryiom khudozhnoho zobrazhennia v tvorchosti ukrainskykh prozaikiv XVII–XVIII st., [v:] Teoryia y ystoryia lyteraturы : k 100-letyiu so dnia rozhdenyia akad. A.Y. Beletskoho, Kyiv 1985, s. 204–211.

Yu.N. Zvezdyna, Эmblematyka v myre starynnoho natiurmorta. K probleme prochtenyia symvola, Moskva 1997, s. 113–119.

V.I. Krekoten, Natiurmort yak pryiom khudozhnoho zobrazhennia v tvorchosti ukrainskykh prozaikiv XVII–XVIII st., [v:] Teoryia y ystoryia lyteraturы : k 100-letyiu so dnia rozhdenyia akad. A.Y. Beletskoho, Kyiv 1985, s. 204–211.

V.P. Pidmohylnyi, Opovidannia. Povist. Romany, vstup. st., uporiad. i prymit. V.O. Melnyka, Kyiv 1991, s. 171–172.

I. Noll, Röslein rot, Zürich 1998, 288 s.

Y. Noll, Prokhladoi dыshyt vecher. Natiurmort na nochnom stolyke: per. s nem. A. Kukys, Moskva 2003, 448 s.

L. Penny, Smertelnыi kholod: per. s anhl. H. Krыlov, Moskva 2015, 416 s.

O. Kharlan, Natiurmort u zhyvopysi i literaturi: osoblyvosti chasoprostoru [w:] "Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie", red. Walentyna Sobol, nr 4, wyd. Zakład Graficzny UW, Warszawa 2017, s. 117-130.